Tuesday, May 9, 2017

Final Reflection For the Semester


Part I: Reflection on Educational Philosophy

Looking back at my first post I feel that my educational philosophy has slightly changed, but for the most part it still holds true. After taking this course and interacting with technology in an educational setting more, I think there are several ways to incorporate technology into our daily lives in the classroom than what I originally knew about. I think that my mindset when developing my original educational philosophy incorporating technology saw technology as more of a “special occasion” type of thing. Now, I see that technology isn’t a special occasion thing, but it is something that everyone uses daily and that our students should know how to navigate and interact with without being intimidated. I think my philosophy has only slightly changed in the way technology is viewed. I will incorporate technology into the classroom daily and ensure that my students have the tools necessary to navigate through technology almost instinctively. With our world quickly becoming technology driven, being a technologically literate person is crucial in reaching success.

Being a little more specific, I will utilize technology in my classroom in several ways. I will create a classroom blog where my students and their families can access a virtual classroom having most of our in-class resources and tools available to them any time they need it. This will also help my students’ families become technologically literate, or maintain their already existing knowledge of technology. I will also incorporate technology into lessons whenever possible, having students create PowerPoints or graphs to effectively convey a message. I will provide my students with several opportunities to utilize technology in an academic setting, preparing them for their future educational needs.



Part II: Reflection on Implementation of each ISTE NET Standard

Standard 1: Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

·         Promote, support and model creative and innovative thinking and inventiveness- These elements were addressed in lessons I’ve created throughout the semester by having students create different artifacts through the use of technology. This allows students to express themselves creatively through the use of technology. In my lessons specifically, students created and modeled bar graphs and created virtual posters and power points to demonstrate their mastery of content being taught. I feel that this was an appropriate way to approach these elements because it allowed for students to meet the objectives of the lesson while using their creativeness and familiarity with technology to do so.

·         Engage students in exploring real-world issues and solving authentic problems using digital tools and resources – These items weren’t specifically addressed in any of my lessons this semester, but I’d address these topics in the classroom by creating research projects for students, allowing them to utilize the resources available to them via technology to extend their knowledge outside of the classroom. With the guide of the teacher, students will develop their research skills and be able to explore real world issues through a variety of resources and learn to differentiate reliable sources from commercial resources. This is an appropriate and effective way to approach these items because it gives students the tools necessary to learn to utilize the internet in a more mature and effective manner than playing academic games or other review tools that can be found on the internet.

·         Promote student reflection using collaborative tools to reveal and clarify students’ conceptual understanding and thinking, planning and creative processes – To implement these ideas in my classroom I would have students create and keep a virtual journal that would also serve as a communication tool between myself and the students. It could be saved onto the share drive and as the teacher I can respond by inserting text boxes where appropriate. This would be an effective way to approach this standard because it allows to students to reflect while using tools available to them through technology.

·         Model collaborative knowledge construction by engaging in learning with students, colleagues, and others in face to face and virtual environments – This was modeled in a lesson I did in having students make Glogs (virtual posters) to describe and give examples of homonyms and homophones. The students worked in partners and utilized technology to find three examples of each and put them together to create a Glog. This is a good way to implement this part of the standards because students are working collaboratively and working with their peers face to face and through a virtual environment.

Standard 2: Design and Develop Digital-Age Learning Experiences and Assessments

·         Design or adapt relevant learning experiences that incorporate digital tools and resources to promote student learning and creativity – These elements were incorporated in a math lesson I did that had the students survey their peers and collect data and create a virtual bar graph with the data they collected. This shows students engaging in learning that is relevant to them and incorporates digital resources. The students are also using creativity in creating their bar graphs and designing them and putting them together.

·         Develop technology enriched learning environments that enable all students to pursue their individual curiosities and become active participants in setting their own educational goals, managing their own learning, and assessing their own progress – I would develop technology enriched learning environments for students by providing them access to technology as often as possible. I would organize trips to the computer lab to help students familiarize themselves with technology as well as utilizing classroom sets of laptops whenever possible to have students complete assignments online. I would also have a virtual classroom available online for students and parents to access the resources available to them via online resources. I think this would help students manage their own learning and assess their own progress by having them utilize technology to monitor their learning whenever possible.

·          Customize and personalize learning activities to address student’s diverse learning styles, working strategies, and abilities using digitals tools their own progress – Learning activities can be personalized to address students’ diverse learning styles by having each child be held accountable for their own learning by incorporating each of the previous mentioned strategies. If students utilize technology appropriately and become active members of the technological world, they can customize and personalize their learning experiences and their diverse needs would be addressed.

·         Provide students with multiple and varied formative and summative assessments aligned with content and technology standards and use resulting data to inform learning and teaching – These elements of the standard can be implemented by the teaching using data collected through a variety of formative and summative assessments and keeping the data via technology and utilizing that data to drive instruction. Depending on the age of the students, students can also keep track of their own learning by recording results from formative and summative assessments and keeping a personal log using an online tool.



Standard 3: Model Digital – Age Work and Learning

·         Demonstrate fluency in technology systems and transfer of current knowledge to new technologies and situations – This can be adapted into the classroom with students taking previous knowledge of technology and the basic use of computers and utilizing that knowledge to further their learning in technology. This can be done especially well with students in older grades that can effectively demonstrate fluency in technology systems and transfer that knowledge to new technologies and current situations by taking their previous basic computer skills and using that as a foundation to further their learning.

·         Collaborate with students, peers, and parents and community members using digital tools and resources to support student success and innovation – I feel that having a classroom blog is a great way to implement this standard because it has the teacher collaborate with students and peer and parents. If appropriate the blog can be open to the community as well. I think this is an effective way to implement this standard because it meets every piece of criteria mentioned in the standard.

·         Communicate relevant information and ideas effectively to students, parents and peers using a variety of digital age media and formats – I think the classroom blog also meets this standard because it will communicate relevant information and ideas effectively to students, peers and parents using a variety of digital age formats. Within the blog there can be multimedia videos, pictures, articles or any form of communication needed to effectively meet this standard.

·         Model and facilitate effective use of current and emerging digital tools to locate, analyze, evaluate, and use information resources to support research and learning – A great way to encompass this standard is to create a research project and have students use technology to gather information. This will allow students to meet every part of the standards by effectively using current and emerging digital tools to locate, analyze and evaluate information resources to support their research and learning.

Standard 4: Promote and Model Digital Citizenship and Responsibility

·         Advocate, model and teach safe, legal, and ethical use of digital information and technology, including respect for copyright, intellectual property, and the appropriate documentation of sources – I think using the above example of having students create an interactive research project would be a good way to implement this strategy because it would be a great way to teach students about copyright and the appropriate documentation of sources among many other things. Teaching students how to filter out unreliable sources and appropriately site those sources.

·         Address the diverse needs of all learners by using learner – centered strategies providing equitable access to appropriate digital tools and resources – This standard can be met by having students work on individualized projects that have strategies targeting each students specific needs and allowing them to work on those needs by utilizing the digital tools and resources available to them. This is appropriate because giving students the opportunity to learn to navigate technology independently can be very beneficial and meets the criteria in this standard.

·         Promote and model digital etiquette and responsible social interactions related to the use of technology and information – I think this standard can be incorporated into everything we do in the classroom. I feel that this is appropriate for this standard because in everything we do in the classroom we need to always promote and model digital etiquette and responsible social interactions related to the use of technology. As teachers, we should model appropriate behavior for our students and lead by example what students should be doing

·         Develop and model cultural understanding and global awareness by engaging with colleagues and students of other cultures using digital-age communication and collaboration tools – One way to incorporate this standard into the classroom is having students choose a holiday they would like to research and then having them present it. This will have students model a cultural understanding and global awareness by researching and learning  about different cultures.



Thursday, April 27, 2017

Silent e Lesson Reflection (Micro Lesson 3)


  1. Instructional Decisions/Teaching (InTask Standard # 9): Discuss the implementation process and describe
    • What went well and what didn't go well during the implementation of your lesson?

During the implementation of the lesson I feel that several things went well. The students were engaged and participated in every part of the lesson. The video was short enough to hold the students’ attention for the duration of the video. I noticed that when the students were working together to come up with new silent e words, they were referring back to the song. What didn’t go well is that I still didn’t meet my time. The lesson was over ten minutes early. Even with doing the extension activities, we still finished early. I feel that if the lesson were done with a class full of students, it would take up the allotted time for the lesson.

    • How well was the alignment to objectives and standards maintained?

The alignment to the objectives and standards was maintained throughout the entire lesson. The objectives aligned directly with the activities done throughout the lesson and the objectives are aligned with the standards. The students completed the lesson and the assessment, therefore meeting the objectives and standards.

    • Describe any modifications made during the implementation of the lesson.

There were no modifications made during the implementation of the lesson. The extension activity was done because the students moved through the lesson so quickly. The content of the lesson seemed to be at the appropriate level for the students and they were able to understand and follow along, but there were also a few challenges with the phonics of words with the silent that led to good class discussions.

  1. Mechanics:
    • What technologies did I use (for the teacher and the learner)?

The technologies used during the lesson were the SmartBoard and class set of laptops.

    • How were the technologies used (by whom and in what manner)?

The SmartBoard was used to play the video for the students. The laptops were used for students to log on to education.com and play the review games after doing the partner work learning about silent e.

    • My lesson was within the correct time frame
      • The lesson ran short by ten minutes. I think this was because we had a very small group this week. There were only three of us and I was teaching, so there were only two students which made the activities go by pretty quickly.



  1. Assessment of Learning (InTask Standard # 6): Refer to Assessing Student Learning
    • Include at least 2 digital artifacts that demonstrate what you or your students (peers) have created as a result of your lesson.



    • Describe your students' level of success in achieving the standards and objectives for your lesson based on your assessment

The students were very successful in achieving the standards and objectives for the lesson. The assessment were completed and both students received 100% mastery. Since the assessment aligns with the standards and objectives, the students achieving 100% mastery show achievement in meeting the objectives and standards of the lesson.

    • Describe the level of success you had in teaching the lesson
      • I believe that I had success in teaching the lesson. My peers seemed to enjoy the lesson and I received positive feedback on the implementation of the lesson. The students achieving mastery in meeting the objectives and standards are also indicative of the success of the lesson.



  1. What did you learn from designing and teaching this lesson and how will you use this in the creation of future lessons/learning activities.

In designing and teaching this lesson I learned that there could be several platforms used in one lesson to allow for students with varying learning styles to be successful throughout the lesson. When I did this lesson in my practicum classroom we didn’t utilize technology. Now, that I’ve found the video to go with the lesson and the review game, I made note of the websites and will definitely be using them in the future.




Sunday, April 23, 2017

Silent "e" Lesson



Click the link below to view the actual lesson plan!





    Lesson Plan: I. Rationale & II. Overview Reflections: Assessing Prior Knowledge and Planning Instructions:

o   What do the students need to know prior to the lesson?



Prior to this lesson students should be familiar with the basic concepts of laptops and how to navigate them. For the anticipatory set the students will be using the classroom laptops to play a review game. Students will need to be able to log on to the laptops and navigate the internet well enough to get to the Brain Pop website and log in to their accounts. The students would already have Brain Pop accounts.



o   How will prior knowledge and experience be assessed?



This prior knowledge would have been taught by the classroom teacher earlier in the year and have an ongoing assessment of the students’ experience with laptops and technology would be monitored by the teacher whenever the laptops were used in the classroom.



o   How will you use this information in the planning process?



This information will be used in the planning process because depending on how familiar and capable the students are with the laptops and technology will determine whether or not this activity would be appropriate for the class. Since this activity is a game, it would be a good opportunity to help reinforce proper technology etiquette and the use of laptops to help students navigate the internet and the game.



o   Why should the content of this lesson be taught at this grade level?



The content of this lesson should be taught at this grade level because it meets the standards for phonics for second grade and the students should have a solid enough background in phonics to be able to understand the concept of the silent e.



o   How do the objectives that you have for the lesson align with the standards?



The objectives for this lesson align with the standards directly because they ask the students to complete the assignment in a way that meets the criteria of the standards. The standard are students engaging in meaningful dialogue geared specifically toward grade level content. By working in pairs, and creating silent e words together, the students are engaging in meaningful dialogue appropriate to grade level content.



o   When will the lesson be taught in the course of the school year? Why?



The lesson will be taught a few months into the school year once students have had a chance to familiarize themselves with the proper ways to use technology in the classroom and what the routines and procedures for using technology in the classroom are. At this point in time the students will also be familiar with appropriate discussion/conversation skills when engaging in dialogue in the classroom.



·         Lesson Plan: III. Implementation Reflection: Designing Instructions:

o   Why are you using the instructional methods you have described?



I decided to use the instructional methods described in the lesson plan because I feel that given the grade level and the content being taught, they would be the most appropriate. I use Thumbs Up Thumbs down in every lesson and even with my students at work because I feel that it is an effective and quick way to gauge the class and see if students are following or not. I also used whole group and partner work to bring the students together as a class and have a whole group discussion, but I also decided to break them off into pairs to work to give them the opportunity to engage with each other and take what we learned during the lecture portion of the lesson and discuss it with peers.



o   How do the instructional methods align with what you know about best practices (think about your methods classes)?



I feel that the instructional methods I use during the lesson align with what I know about best practices because I’ve seen them used in several of my practicum classroom and we’ve had several assignments that have required research on best practices in the classroom. Each method used during this lesson was either seen in a practicum room or came up in article readings required for previous methods courses.



o   How are you engaging students in creative and higher order thinking?



Students are being engaged in creative and higher order thinking by having to create their own words using the letter cards. The student will engage in dialogue with their partner and come up with as many words as they can. Once they have found several words, they will have to choose three and write them in a sentence using them correctly having students not only spell the words, but also be sure of the meaning of the word in order to use them correctly in  a sentence.



·         Lesson Plan: IV. Assessment Reflection: Planning Assessment:

o   How does the assessment align with the standards and objectives of this lesson?



The assessment aligns with the standards and objectives of this lesson directly with the students creating words that end in e with the letter cards and then writing three sentences using three of the words they created. In completing the assessment, both objectives will be met. The objectives align with the standards so as long as the objectives are met, the students are meeting the standards addressed during the lesson.



o   How does the assessment demonstrate that the students have been successful in learning the content?



The assessment demonstrates that the students have been successful in learning the content because the assessment is tied directly to the objectives and the standards. By completing the assessment with at least 80% accuracy the students would successfully meet the objective and demonstrate success in learning the content.



o   How does the assessment demonstrate student engagement in higher order thinking?

The assessment demonstrates student engagement in higher order thinking because it requires them to think deeper about the lesson by going beyond just coming up with silent e words, but also using them in sentences demonstrating complete understanding of the words.



o   How does the assessment demonstrate that the individual student needs were met?



The assessment demonstrates that the individuals needs were met because the students being able to complete the assessment shows that their needs were met throughout the lesson and they were able to make it to the assessment successfully and complete it.



·         Lesson Plan: V. Materials & Resources Reflection:

o   How does your lesson meet each of the ISTE NET’s Standards?



The ISTE NET’s Standards were met during the anticipatory set of the lesson while the students were on the laptops. Anytime a student is using technology, especially on the internet, the ISTE NET’s Standards are being met. If a student is to be a global digital citizen, all standards should be met. The teacher should embed each of the standards when teaching students how to properly utilize technology.



o   How does your lesson meet Standard 1: Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity?



This lesson doesn’t address the first standard specifically because the students aren’t exactly creating any sort of artifact, but it is touched upon as the students interact on the website Brain Pop and engage in a fun activity while practicing a academic content.



o   How does your lesson meet Standard 2: Provide Digital Age Learning Experiences and Assessment?



Standards 2 is met anytime a student is using technology because it is providing them with the opportunity to experience digital age experiences through the use of technology. By providing students with these opportunities, they are learning to become global digital citizens.



o   How does your lesson meet Standard 3: Model Digital Age Work & Learning?



Standards 3 is met by modeling appropriate use of technology during the lesson and then allowing students to utilize technology independently. They are working on the laptops and learning new content not only academically, but every time a student is able to use technology, they become more familiar with it and learn to navigate it.



o   How does your lesson meet all four elements of Standard 4: Promote and Model Digital Age Citizenship and Responsibility by:

§  advocating, modeling, and teaching safe, legal, and ethical use of digital information and technology, including respect for copyright, intellectual property, and the appropriate documentation of sources.

§  addressing the diverse needs of all learners by using learner-centered strategies providing equitable access to appropriate digital tools and resources.

§  promoting and modeling digital etiquette and responsible social interactions related to the use of technology and information.

§  developing and modeling cultural understanding and global awareness by engaging with colleagues and students of other cultures using digital-age communication and collaboration tools.



All four elements of standard 4 are rooted into any lesson involving technology. Students have a natural tendency to these types of behaviors, it is the teachers responsibility to guide students towards these elements and emphasize them to show students the importance of these elements when utilizing technology. By allowing students to the chance to interact with technology, they are allowing students to build up their familiarity with technology and the appropriate way to use it.

Monday, April 17, 2017

Homonym Homophone Lesson (Reflection on 2nd technology lesson)


  1. Instructional Decisions/Teaching (InTask Standard # 9): Discuss the implementation process and describe
    • What went well and what didn't go well during the implementation of your lesson?

I feel that what went well during my lesson was that the students were engaged and seemed genuinely interested in the topic. As I was giving the lesson, I did kind of feel that it may not be age or grade appropriate. The lesson was on homophones and homonyms. The anticipatory set was the reading of a picture book discussing homophones and homonyms. I knew the book may be too “childish” for fourth grade, but that’s what I liked about it. It took something that could potentially be confusing for students and clarified and simplified it for students to understand. Maybe in an actual classroom the lesson would flow better, but I feel that it is cutting it kind of close. My idea of that anticipatory set will work really well or it may not work at all. I’d definitely have to gauge my students and know my audience when putting the lesson together.

    • How well was the alignment to objectives and standards maintained?

The alignment of the objectives and standards was maintained throughout the lesson. The lesson as chosen for fourth grade because in the fourth grade ELA standards is the first time homonyms and homophones are mentioned. The lesson focused on both homonyms and homophones, ensuring the alignment of the standards to the objective of the lesson.

    • Describe any modifications made during the implementation of the lesson.

Originally the lesson was supposed to have been done with the students using Glogster.com to create posters describing homonyms and homophones, but due to technological difficulties Glogster wasn’t available. The lesson was modified to work around this, and the students were asked to make a PowerPoint presentation giving examples of homonyms and homophones.

  1. Mechanics:
    • What technologies did I use (for the teacher and the learner)?

The technologies used for this lesson were PowerPoint, by the teacher and the student and the SmartBoard by the teacher. The teacher would have an example PowerPoint done to show the students what the expectations are, and then the students would create their own PowerPoint using the laptops.

    • How were the technologies used (by whom and in what manner)?

I’ve already answered this question in my response to the previous question, but originally the students would have used the laptops to log on to Glogster to create their own poster about homonyms and homophones. The teacher would have used to SmartBoard to show the Glogster she made and the students would have used to laptops and logged on to the internet and into their Glogster accounts to create a  new glog. When creating the lesson, it was understood that the students would be familiar with Glogster. I hope to be able to effectively utilize Glogster in my future classroom.

    • My lesson was within the correct time frame.

I originally thought my lesson was short by about five minutes, but when I saw my grade, I saw in the notes that my lesson was short by FIFTEEN minutes! As a teacher, I need to make sure I am keeping up with the time frame I have for each lesson and that I am following my own daily schedule to ensure my students have enough time to work on everything they need to work on. It also could have run short because we are students at the college level and I only had two group members which for the sake of this assignment meant there were only two students. Regardless of that, I do need to make sure I focus more on my time management because I thought my lesson was only 5 minutes short, when in reality it was fifteen minutes short and I feel that that is a big enough time difference that I, as the teacher, should have been aware of without it needing to be pointed out.

  1. Assessment of Learning (InTask Standard # 6): Refer to Assessing Student Learning
    • Include at least 2 digital artifacts that demonstrate what you or your students (peers) have created as a result of your lesson

Here are pictures of the PowerPoint presentations that were completed during my lesson.  



    • Describe your students' level of success in achieving the standards and objectives for your lesson based on your assessment

My students were very successful in achieving the standards and objectives of the lesson. The assessment was the completed PowerPoint presentation with correct examples of homonyms and homophones and both students successfully completed their presentations and presented them to the class.

    • Describe the level of success you had in teaching the lesson

I believe that my level of success in teaching the lesson was fairly high. The students were engaged in the lesson and understood the concept being taught. The objectives were met and the students were able to successfully complete the assessment demonstrating their knowledge and meeting the objectives.

  1. What did you learn from designing and teaching this lesson and how will you use this in the creation of future lessons/learning activities.

I think I’ve sort of answered this question in the responses to the other questions. I learned that I need to pay attention the time and make sure I effectively utilize the time allotted for each lesson or subject area being taught. I also learned that it is very important to know your audience and know what will work with your students and what may not work so well. I still feel that reading that book as the anticipatory set, although, a bit below their reading level will be a good way to hook the students and really break down what homonyms and homophones are in a way that they will understand the information and retain it.






Monday, April 3, 2017

Backtracking a bit....

The following questions are reflection questions for the first lesson I posted integrating technology (the bar graph lesson). I wasn't feeling well last week and wasn't able to post the reflection at the appropriate time. If you were interested in the bar graph and lesson and would like to see what went right and what could have gone a little better with that lesson, feel free to continue reading! It was a great lesson and there are pictures of completed bar graphs also!



  1. Instructional Decisions/Teaching (InTask Standard # 9): Discuss the implementation process and describe
    • What went well and what didn't go well during the implementation of your lesson?
What I noticed went well during the implementation of my lesson was that the students were engaged and they seemed to understand the concept. The directions were simple and easy to follow. Everyone was able to collect their data and create a bar graph representing that dat. Something I noticed that didn’t go very well in the lesson was that it was too easy to follow. Even though the lesson was done with peers at a college level, I could still tell as I went through the lesson that it may be too simple for fifth graders. Maybe I could add another component to the data being collected to make the bar graph a little more complicated and challenge the students.
    • How well was the alignment to objectives and standards maintained?
The alignment to the objective and standards was maintained well throughout the lesson. The elements of a graph were reviewed and students interacted with the graphs and were able to effectively collect data and create their own bar graphs will all of its essential elements.
    • Describe any modifications made during the implementation of the lesson.
There were no modifications made during the implementation of the lesson. I think if I noticed that the task was too easy for the students, I should have added another component to the graph to give the students more of a challenge and make use of the time provided for the lesson.
  1. Mechanics:
    • What technologies did I use (for the teacher and the learner)?
The technologies used for this lesson were the SmartBoard and laptops for the students.
    • How were the technologies used (by whom and in what manner)?
The SmartBoard was used by the teacher to show the students what a completed bar graph should look like. The students used laptops to open a Microsoft Word document and create their own bar graph.
    • My lesson was not within the correct time frame…
I think I already began to address this issue in earlier response, my lesson was not within the correct time frame because I feel it was too simple and we went through every part of the lesson quickly. My lesson ran short. I feel that it ran extra short because it was done with my peers at a college level, but reflecting back on my lesson and hearing my instructions said aloud, I think it would have been too simple for the fifth grade students as well. I should make the lesson more challenging for the students by adding another component to the bar graph and maybe compare data collected as opposed to just collecting and recording it.
  1. Assessment of Learning (InTask Standard # 6): Refer to Assessing Student Learning
    • Include at least 2 digital artifacts that demonstrate what you or your students (peers) have created as a result of your lesson.

     






    • Describe your students' level of success in achieving the standards and objectives for your lesson based on your assessment.

The students were all successful in achieving the standards and objectives for my lesson. The ease with which they reached success in such short time is also what helped me see that my lesson was too simple for this group of students and not very challenging.

    • Describe the level of success you had in teaching the lesson
I believe that to a certain extent my lesson was successful because it was executed well and the objectives and standards were all met and the students were all involved and active during the lesson.
      • How do your individual reflections support this?
I believe my individual reflections do support this, but also I think I need to acknowledge that maybe my lesson was so successful because it wasn’t challenging enough for the students. I should have added more and made sure the students were active during the whole half hour that was allotted for the lesson.

      • How do the comments from your classmates support this?
I believe that the comments from my classmates support the success of the lesson because they all reached the objective and were able to follow my directions and engage in the lesson effectively. I did receive a few suggestions on making the lesson more challenging, solidifying what I already thought.